Which is awfully convenient when you’re running interference for dictators and fascists. The cool thing about playing the hypocrisy card – over and over and over again, even when the equivalences are transparently false: Greenwald doesn’t have to actually take a position on the merits of the issue. hypocrisy about the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Do you point out that FOX lawyers argued his viewers know not to believe everything he says? MSNBC lawyers made the same argument about Maddow!.Are you one of those sheeple who condemns Orbán’s war against independent media even while the U.S.That would be, of course, to accuse his targets of hypocrisy. Glenn may straight out lie when convenient, but it’s not the most frequent tool in his rhetorical arsenal. (Now, of course, he just defends Carlson outright.) I’m pretty sure it’s essentially the same tactic he once used to deflect questions about Carlson’s crypto-fascism: he’d claim that he didn’t regularly watch the show. I still find this particular lie notable. I also found an interview of Greenwald from February of the same year:Īs my kid pointed out, it’s hardly shocking that Greenwald is a liar. I didn’t get far when I came across something interesting: a tweet from November of 2021 (the whole thread isn’t that important).
![is there gay midget porn is there gay midget porn](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-rs52PHqb_NE/UEtYqf0ziOI/AAAAAAAAD8Y/TgBVZovB4no/s1600/mid4.jpg)
I therefore set out to find what Greenwald had said about mass shootings when he was still consistently presenting himself as a member of the left. “I think that the obsession that people who are doing politics full-time have with seeing the world through this prism of partisan warfare is so consuming that it basically drains their entire soul so that nothing is left but this kind of immediate need to use every situation, no matter how tragic, to gain some kind of an advantage,” he said. Later, Greenwald said it is much too early in the postmortem investigation to determine what role gun laws or other factors had in the massacre. The Substack writer called Biden’s comments from there on “grotesque” but “unsurprising.” “And he spent about six seconds doing that and then immediately did a detour to figure out how he could squeeze and exploit this situation for partisan advantage.” He could really empathize with in a unique way with how uniquely heinous it is,” Greenwald said. What was the replacement-level commentary in question? Here’s FOX treating what someone says on their opinion shows as straight news: So when Greenwald’s latest regurgitation of bog-standard right-wing talking points crossed my Twitter feed, I resigned myself to the inevitable: I would have to take to the Google and investigate. I can say that among its myriad privileges and obligations is a rather unpleasant task: to occasionally venture into Glenn Greenwald-adjacent space and document the atrocities.
![is there gay midget porn is there gay midget porn](https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/britishcomics/images/2/24/TVcomicWho1.jpg)
![is there gay midget porn is there gay midget porn](http://media.hometeamsonline.com/photos/football/GPKPACKERS/ATOM2015.jpg)
I cannot, of course, disclose all of the terms. Readers may not know this, but all “front pagers” at Lawyers, Guns and Money sign a rather lengthy blood covenant.